{"id":1217,"date":"2016-10-10T23:11:32","date_gmt":"2016-10-11T06:11:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1217"},"modified":"2016-10-10T23:11:32","modified_gmt":"2016-10-11T06:11:32","slug":"2015-winter-run-salmon-progress-report-lessons-learned-and-not-learned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1217","title":{"rendered":"2015 Winter-Run Salmon Progress Report \u2013 Lessons Learned and Not Learned"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Sacramento River Temperature Task Group\u2019s report on water year 2015<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1217-1' id='fnref-1217-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(1217)'>1<\/a><\/sup> released at the end of last year prematurely proclaimed successful operations for 2015 under its Temperature Control Plan (TCP). If the Group had waited a few more months, it would have reported utter failure, with the poorest survival and production of winter-run salmon yet recorded.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1217-2' id='fnref-1217-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(1217)'>2<\/a><\/sup> Below, I excerpt from the Report, and offer some observations.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In summary, water year 2015 has been one of the driest years in decades and it followed three consecutive dry years throughout the state. Shasta Reservoir was projected to have end of year storage of 1.1 MAF in the May 90% forecast. Due to such low storage in Shasta Reservoir, Reclamation utilized Trinity River water to conserve Shasta Reservoir storage. The amount of water brought over from Trinity River through the Spring Creek Tunnel into Keswick Reservoir was a great benefit to the temperature operations on the Sacramento River. In all, Reclamation achieved meeting the TCP at Clear Creek (see Chart 1) of 57\u00b0F not to exceed 58\u00b0F through October 1, 2015, as indicated in the Temperature Management Plan, when 90% of the redds were emerging.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment:<\/span> The Trinity water brought into Keswick Reservoir was 58-59\u00b0F, warmer than even the downstream criteria, resulting in more of the Shasta cold-water pool being used to cool it. The problem was recognized by the parties, as it resulted in demands to replace the existing Whiskeytown temperature curtain to cool the Trinity water before it was released into Keswick Reservoir. Achieving the 2015 goal of not exceeding 58\u00b0F turned out ineffective as well. Less than normal amounts of Trinity water have been brought into Keswick so far in 2016.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Despite the SRTTG best projection and modeling efforts to manage Sacramento River water temperature for winter-run spawning and egg incubation in water year (WY) 2014, winter-run brood year (BY) 2014 was considered a year class failure. One hundred percent of BY 2014 redds were exposed to temps above 56\u00b0F daily average temperature (DAT) at the Sacramento River above Clear Creek California Data Exchange Center monitoring station temperature compliance point (CCR) at some time period during WY 2014. Of significant concern were those eggs, alevin, and fry exposed to the elevated DAT above 56\u00b0F (and as high as 62.3\u00b0F) throughout September and October when the cold water pool out of Shasta Reservoir was depleted.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment:<\/span> So the Task Group met the monthly average but allowed the daily average temperature to exceed 58\u00b0F in summer 2015 (Charts 2 and 3). The Report suggests improvement compared to 2014 conditions, but 2015 was also above 56\u00b0F. On 10% of the days in summer 2015, hourly water temperature exceeded 60\u00b0F at the CCR gage at Bonnyview Bridge in Redding during warm afternoons. On 60% of the days, water temperature reached or exceeded 59\u00b0F, the tolerance limit for salmon eggs and embryos. <sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1217-3' id='fnref-1217-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(1217)'>3<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Temperature monitoring results of 70 loggers indicated slight variation and stratification in temperature between in-river, backwater, and deep pools, but in general all winter-run salmon eggs and alevins were exposed to poor water quality due to warm water temperatures.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment:<\/span> If they knew this, why did they allow it?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The plan called for real-time operations that targeted 57\u00b0 at the Clear Creek compliance location not to exceed 58\u00b0F with minimized flows. By targeting 57\u00b0F not to exceed 58\u00b0F, where the majority of the redds were above Hwy 44, we were able to extend the use of the cold water pool.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment:<\/span> By targeting the Clear Creek compliance location, the Task Group pretty much assured that adult winter-run salmon would seek out cooler waters near Redding, essentially confining their spawning to the uppermost 10 miles of their historic 60 mile spawning reach. The Group extended the cold-water pool by creating low survival conditions in the spawning reach. Reclamation was able to bring in warmer Trinity water for water supply (at the expense of Shasta\u2019s cold-water pool) and did not have to sacrifice hydropower or peaking hydropower using Shasta Dam\u2019s warm-water bypass (an operation which most likely would have been required if the target had been the appropriate 56\u00b0F). Reclamation was also able to meet its water supply commitment of 75% allocation to the Sacramento River settlement contractors in the fourth year of drought. So far in 2016, Reclamation has met its commitment of 100% allocation to the settlement contractors.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps more perplexing is what was left out of the report: water temperature and flow conditions in the salmon-migration and sturgeon-spawning reach in over 100 miles of the Sacramento River below Red Bluff. There was no mention of the Basin Plan\u2019s targets for this reach of the river where water temperatures were too high (&gt;22\u00b0C, 72\u00b0F) to allow adult salmon migration, while creating lethal conditions (&gt;20\u00b0C, 68\u00b0F) for juvenile sturgeon<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1217-4' id='fnref-1217-4' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(1217)'>4<\/a><\/sup> (Chart 4). There was a complete disregard for the winter-run salmon objective of 56\u00b0C at Red Bluff in the Basin Plan, Water Right Order 90-05, and the NMFS BO: all 150 days from May through September failed to meet the objective (Chart 5). So far in 2016, the objective has yet to be met, despite the fact that Shasta was nearly full at the beginning of May.<\/p>\n<p>Hopefully, the Winter Run 2016 report will be more comprehensive and complete than the Report for 2015. The 2016 Report should include not only the consequences for spawning habitat near Redding, but should also analyze the condition of rearing and migratory habitat below Redding through the fall and winter. The report should also cover consequences to the other salmon, including the ten million federal hatchery salmon smolts released near Redding.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1220\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image1-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1220\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1220\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image1-1.png\" alt=\"Chart 1. Map of 60 miles spawning reach below Keswick Dam on Sacramento River. Various temperature compliance points are noted. The NMFS BO specifies Bend Bridge with relaxation allowed in drier years. In 2015 the compliance point was above Hwy 44 bridge. Clear Creek 58F DAT was the compliance point in spring 2016. Balls Ferry 56\u00b0F is present compliance point in summer 2016.\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image1-1.png 640w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image1-1-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image1-1-500x281.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1220\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chart 1. Map of 60 miles spawning reach below Keswick Dam on Sacramento River. Various temperature compliance points are noted. The NMFS BO specifies Bend Bridge with relaxation allowed in drier years. In 2015 the compliance point was above Hwy 44 bridge. Clear Creek 58F DAT was the compliance point in spring 2016. Balls Ferry 56\u00b0F is present compliance point in summer 2016.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_1221\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1221\" class=\"size-large wp-image-1221\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2-1024x415.png\" alt=\"Chart 2. Summary of 2015 spring-summer monthly average temperature at Clear Creek compliance point.\" width=\"584\" height=\"237\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2-1024x415.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2-300x122.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2-768x311.png 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2-500x203.png 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart-2.png 1073w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1221\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chart 2. Summary of 2015 spring-summer monthly average temperature at Clear Creek compliance point.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_1223\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1223\" class=\"size-large wp-image-1223\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3-1024x723.png\" alt=\"Chart 3. Summer 2015 spring-summer water temperatures at compliance locations. Note the red line is one degree above the target 56\u00b0F they noted.\" width=\"584\" height=\"412\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3-1024x723.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3-300x212.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3-768x542.png 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3-425x300.png 425w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/chart3.png 1213w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1223\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chart 3. Summer 2015 spring-summer water temperatures at compliance locations. Note the red line is one degree above the target 56\u00b0F they noted.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_1224\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1224\" class=\"wp-image-1224 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4-1024x473.jpeg\" alt=\"Chart 4. Water temperature and river flow at Wilkins Slough at RM 125 on the Sacramento River May-September 2015. Historical average flow shown by green triangles.\" width=\"584\" height=\"270\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4-1024x473.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4-300x139.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4-768x355.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4-500x231.jpeg 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image4.jpeg 1534w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1224\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chart 4. Water temperature and river flow at Wilkins Slough at RM 125 on the Sacramento River May-September 2015. Historical average flow shown by green triangles.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_1225\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1225\" class=\"size-large wp-image-1225\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Chart 5. All 150 days from May through September were higher than the 56\u00b0F Basin Plan objective for Red Bluff. \" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1-768x413.png 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/image5-1-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1225\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chart 5. All 150 days from May through September were higher than the 56\u00b0F Basin Plan objective for Red Bluff.<\/p><\/div>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-1217'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-1217-1'> <a href=\"http:\/\/deltacouncil.ca.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2015\/10\/Item%202%202015%20SRTTG%20Annual%20Report%20with%20Attachment.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/deltacouncil.ca.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2015\/10\/Item%202%202015%20SRTTG%20Annual%20Report%20with%20Attachment.pdf<\/a>  <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1217-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-1217-2'> <a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=867\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=867<\/a>  <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1217-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-1217-3'>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.calwater.ca.gov\/Admin_Record\/C-085270.pdf\">http:\/\/www.calwater.ca.gov\/Admin_Record\/C-085270.pdf<\/a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1217-3'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-1217-4'> <a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=867\">http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=867<\/a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1217-4'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sacramento River Temperature Task Group\u2019s report on water year 20151 released at the end of last year prematurely proclaimed successful operations for 2015 under its Temperature Control Plan (TCP). If the Group had waited a few more months, it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1217\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,18,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chinook","category-northern-california","category-water-quality"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1217"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1229,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217\/revisions\/1229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}