{"id":1488,"date":"2017-01-23T17:45:43","date_gmt":"2017-01-24T01:45:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1488"},"modified":"2017-01-23T17:45:43","modified_gmt":"2017-01-24T01:45:43","slug":"more-on-splittail-status","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1488","title":{"rendered":"More on Splittail Status"},"content":{"rendered":"

Recently<\/a>, I summarized survey information from the Bay-Delta on Sacramento splittail that depicted a potentially grim picture of the future of this special status species.\u00a0 In that post, I did not include trawl survey info from Suisun Marsh Fish Study<\/a> collected annually by UC Davis (Figure 1), which indicates a core population of adult splittail still present in Suisun Marsh.\u00a0 Other core populations exist in San Pablo Bay (Petaluma and Napa Rivers).\u00a0 Peter Moyle and Teejay O\u2019Rear (UC Davis, personal communications) believe the Marsh core population is sufficiently strong and resistant to extinction.<\/p>\n

Looking at Figure 1, the Suisun Marsh population survived the 1987-1992 drought, building in numbers with strong recruitment (ages 0 and 1) in the wet years of 1995-2000.\u00a0 Recruitment declined during the 2007-2009 drought, but there was strong recruitment in the wetter 2010 and 2011 water years.\u00a0 Recruitment declined in the 2012-2014 drought years, but remains substantially higher than at the end of the 1987-1992 drought.\u00a0 Teejay O\u2019Rear states the population has remained strong through 2015 and 2016, with some recruitment in the wetter 2016, and likely strong recruitment in the spring of 2017, presuming it stays wet.<\/p>\n

\"Figure<\/a>

Figure 1. Catch-per-unit-effort of Sacramento splittail in Suisun Marsh 1980-2014 by age group. (Source: Teejay O\u2019Rear, UC Davis)<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Recently, I summarized survey information from the Bay-Delta on Sacramento splittail that depicted a potentially grim picture of the future of this special status species.\u00a0 In that post, I did not include trawl survey info from Suisun Marsh Fish Study … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-splittail"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1488"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1488\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1492,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1488\/revisions\/1492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}