{"id":150,"date":"2015-04-23T09:14:20","date_gmt":"2015-04-23T09:14:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=150"},"modified":"2015-06-17T19:01:54","modified_gmt":"2015-06-18T02:01:54","slug":"delta-april-bloom-related-to-low-exports-and-san-joaquin-pulse-flow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=150","title":{"rendered":"Delta April Bloom Related to Low Exports and San Joaquin Pulse Flow"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A San Joaquin River pulse flow and low Delta exports in April have led to a plankton bloom in the Central Delta. The pulse flow (Figure 1) and low exports (1500 cfs) were the result of two drought-related actions of the State Water Resources Control Board in its April 6, 2015 Temporary Urgency Change Order. The bloom is a consequence of low net transport flows in central Delta channels toward the south Delta export pumps and of the water habitat thus being allowed to \u201cstew\u201d with nutrients from the San Joaquin River. Chlorophyll levels rose with the onset of the pulse flow and recently have begun to decline with the end of the pulse flow (Figures 4-10). Chlorophyll levels were much lower in the west, north, east, and south parts of the Delta and in Suisun Bay, when compared to the central Delta. This process was described by Arthur and Ball (1977)<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-150-1' id='fnref-150-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(150)'>1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cDuring spring through fall, export pumping from the southern Delta caused a net flow reversal in the lower San Joaquin River, drawing Sacramento River water across the central Delta to the export pumps. The relatively deep channels and short water residence time apparently resulted in the chlorophyll concentrations remaining low from the northern Delta and in the cross-Delta flow to the pumps.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Such a spring bloom is important because it stimulates Delta productivity that is key to native Delta fish survival and production. Lack of Delta productivity over the past several decades (Figure 2) has been related to the Pelagic Organism Decline and near extinction of Delta Smelt (Jassby et al 2003)<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-150-2' id='fnref-150-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(150)'>2<\/a><\/sup>. Low chlorophyll levels are also related to poor zooplankton growth rates (Figure 3).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_152\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-1-San-Joaquin-Inflows.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-152\" class=\"wp-image-152 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-1-San-Joaquin-Inflows-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 1.  San Joaquin River inflows into the Delta at Vernalis during April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-1-San-Joaquin-Inflows.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-1-San-Joaquin-Inflows-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-1-San-Joaquin-Inflows-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-152\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1. San Joaquin River inflows into the Delta at Vernalis during April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_153\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-153\" class=\"wp-image-153 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-2-Spring-Delta-chlorophyll-1024x616.png\" alt=\"Figure 2. Spring Delta chlorophyll levels below 10 micrograms per liter are considered low primary productivity. (Source: Jassby et al. 2003)\" width=\"584\" height=\"351\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-2-Spring-Delta-chlorophyll-1024x616.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-2-Spring-Delta-chlorophyll-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-2-Spring-Delta-chlorophyll-500x300.png 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-2-Spring-Delta-chlorophyll.png 1465w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-153\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Spring Delta chlorophyll levels below 10 micrograms per liter are considered low primary productivity. (Source: Jassby et al. 2003)<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_154\" style=\"width: 233px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-154\" class=\"wp-image-154 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-3-Zooplanton-growth-223x300.png\" alt=\"Figure 3.  Zooplankton growth rates peak above chlorophyll levels above 10 micrograms per liter.  (Source: Jassby et al. 2003)\" width=\"223\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-3-Zooplanton-growth-223x300.png 223w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-3-Zooplanton-growth-760x1024.png 760w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-3-Zooplanton-growth.png 1177w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 223px) 100vw, 223px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-154\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3. Zooplankton growth rates peak above chlorophyll levels above 10 micrograms per liter. (Source: Jassby et al. 2003)<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_155\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-155\" class=\"wp-image-155 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-4-Stations-with-chlorophyll-data-1024x559.png\" alt=\"Figure 4.  The six stations with chlorophyll data presented in the following charts from west to east are: \u2022ANH \u2013 Antioch \u2022BLP \u2013 Blind Point \u2022OSJ \u2013 Old River at Franks Tract \u2022 PPT \u2013 San Joaquin River at Prisoners Point \u2022HLT \u2013 Middle River at Holt \u2022TRN \u2013 Turner Cut \" width=\"584\" height=\"319\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-4-Stations-with-chlorophyll-data-1024x559.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-4-Stations-with-chlorophyll-data-300x164.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-4-Stations-with-chlorophyll-data-500x273.png 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-4-Stations-with-chlorophyll-data.png 1159w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-155\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4. The six stations with chlorophyll data presented in the following charts from west to east are:<br \/> \u2022 ANH \u2013 Antioch<br \/> \u2022 BLP \u2013 Blind Point<br \/> \u2022 OSJ \u2013 Old River at Franks Tract<br \/> \u2022 PPT \u2013 San Joaquin River at Prisoners Point<br \/> \u2022 HLT \u2013 Middle River at Holt<br \/> \u2022 TRN \u2013 Turner Cut<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_156\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-5-Antioch-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-156\" class=\"wp-image-156 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-5-Antioch-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 5.  Antioch chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-5-Antioch-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-5-Antioch-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-5-Antioch-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-156\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5. Antioch chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_157\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-6-Blind-Point-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-157\" class=\"wp-image-157 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-6-Blind-Point-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 6.  Blind Point chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-6-Blind-Point-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-6-Blind-Point-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-6-Blind-Point-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-157\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6. Blind Point chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_158\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-7-Old-River-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-158\" class=\"wp-image-158 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-7-Old-River-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 7.  Old River chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-7-Old-River-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-7-Old-River-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-7-Old-River-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-158\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7. Old River chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_159\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-8-Prisoners-Point-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-159\" class=\"wp-image-159 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-8-Prisoners-Point-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 8.  Prisoners Point chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-8-Prisoners-Point-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-8-Prisoners-Point-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-8-Prisoners-Point-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-159\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8. Prisoners Point chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_160\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-9-Middle-River-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-160\" class=\"wp-image-160 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-9-Middle-River-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 9.  Middle River chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-9-Middle-River-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-9-Middle-River-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-9-Middle-River-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-160\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9. Middle River chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_161\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-10-Turner-Cut-chlorophyll.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-161\" class=\"wp-image-161 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-10-Turner-Cut-chlorophyll-1024x550.png\" alt=\"Figure 10.  Turner Cut chlorophyll levels April 2015.\" width=\"584\" height=\"314\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-10-Turner-Cut-chlorophyll.png 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-10-Turner-Cut-chlorophyll-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Figure-10-Turner-Cut-chlorophyll-500x269.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-161\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 10. Turner Cut chlorophyll levels April 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-150'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-150-1'>\u00a0 Arthur, J, and M. Ball. 1977. Planktonic Chlorophyll Dynamics in the Northern San Francisco Bay and Delta. Fifty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, June 12-16, 1977.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/downloads.ice.ucdavis.edu\/sfestuary\/conomos_1979\/archive1029.PDF\">http:\/\/downloads.ice.ucdavis.edu\/sfestuary\/conomos_1979\/archive1029.PDF<\/a>\u00a0 <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-150-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-150-2'> Jassby, A., J. Cloern, and A. Muller-Solger. 2003.\u00a0 Phytoplankton fuels Delta food web.\u00a0 <em>California Agriculture <\/em>57(4): 104-109. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-150-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A San Joaquin River pulse flow and low Delta exports in April have led to a plankton bloom in the Central Delta. The pulse flow (Figure 1) and low exports (1500 cfs) were the result of two drought-related actions of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=150\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bay-delta","category-water-quality"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=150"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":188,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150\/revisions\/188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}