{"id":2262,"date":"2018-08-02T22:31:01","date_gmt":"2018-08-03T05:31:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=2262"},"modified":"2018-08-11T17:33:26","modified_gmt":"2018-08-12T00:33:26","slug":"would-waterfix-tunnel-intakes-be-protective-of-north-delta-fish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=2262","title":{"rendered":"Would WaterFix Tunnel Intakes be Protective of North Delta Fish?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Department of Water Resources\u2019 consultant on in the WaterFix tunnels hearing testified:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cBut for those Smelts that are occurring in that area, the North Delta diversions will be designed to fish agency protective standards\u201d\u2026 \u201cThat opening, based on analyses, would prevent entrainment of Smelts that are greater than about 21 to 22 millimeters.\u201d<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2262-1' id='fnref-2262-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2262)'>1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn the EIR\/EIS, the only significant and unavoidable impact that we found was for Striped Bass and American Shad. This is because of entrainment of early life stages at the North Delta diversions. These are species that spawn upstream of the North Delta diversions, in large part\u2026..<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2262-2' id='fnref-2262-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2262)'>2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>For American Shad, studies suggest that many American Shad were upstream of the Delta and, therefore, when they&#8217;re coming down into the Delta, they would be sufficiently large to be screened by the North Delta diversions.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>Delta Smelt<\/h2>\n<p>Delta smelt spawn in the north Delta in late winter and early spring. Their juveniles occur through summer. Their young would be highly susceptible to entrainment throughout spring (Figure 1).<\/p>\n<h2>White Sturgeon<\/h2>\n<p>Sturgeon, both green and white, spawn above the Delta in the lower Sacramento River in early spring. Their larvae and early juvenile stages reach the Delta in spring at a size highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 2).<\/p>\n<h2>American Shad<\/h2>\n<p>American shad spawn in the lower Sacramento River and tributaries in late spring and summer. Their larvae and early juveniles are prevalent in the north Delta in late spring and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 3).<\/p>\n<h2>Striped Bass<\/h2>\n<p>Striped bass spawn predominantly in the lower Sacramento River in spring. Their larvae reach the north Delta in May and June, and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 4).<\/p>\n<h2>Splittail<\/h2>\n<p>Splittail spawn in the lower Sacramento River floodplain in spring. Their early juveniles reach the north Delta usually in May and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 5).<\/p>\n<h2>Prickly Sculpin<\/h2>\n<p>Prickly sculpin, an abundant native Delta fish, spawn in the lower Sacramento River in late winter and their larvae are found in the north Delta in early spring and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 6).<\/p>\n<h2>Sacramento Sucker<\/h2>\n<p>Sacramento sucker spawn in Valley rivers in spring. Their larvae and early juveniles are present in the north Delta throughout spring and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 7).<\/p>\n<h2>Threadfin Shad<\/h2>\n<p>Non-native threadfin shad, the most abundant forage fish in the Delta, spawn from late spring into summer throughout the Delta and lower rivers. Their larvae and early juveniles are prevalent in the north Delta in late spring and early summer, and would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (Figure 8).<\/p>\n<h2>Summary and Conclusions<\/h2>\n<p>Larval and early juvenile lifestages of many Delta fishes would be highly vulnerable to entrainment through the screens of the proposed WaterFix north Delta intakes. Juvenile\/fry of these and other species (salmon<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-2262-3' id='fnref-2262-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(2262)'>3<\/a><\/sup>) would be highly vulnerable to impingement and predation at the screens.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2264\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2264\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2264\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image1.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2264\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1. Length frequency of Delta smelt captured in the California Department Fish and Wildlife\u2019s annual Delta-wide <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a>. For each sub-graph within this figure and each of the following figures, the x-axis shows the length in millimeters of captured fish, and y-axis shows the number of captured fish of each length. Note that most of the early spring post-spawn larvae and juveniles are of a size highly vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2266\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2266\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2266\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image2.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2266\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Length frequency of white sturgeon captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note larval sturgeon were captured soon after their spawning period in spring at a highly vulnerable size to entrainment. Many larvae of the main lower Sacramento River population of white sturgeon would pass the proposed WaterFix intakes.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2267\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2267\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2267\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image3.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2267\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3. Length frequency of American shad captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note that most of the shad would have to pass the proposed north Delta intakes in spring at a size highly vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2268\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2268\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2268\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image4.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2268\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4. Length frequency of striped bass captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note that most of these striped bass larvae would have had to pass the area of the proposed north Delta WaterFix intakes at a size would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2269\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2269\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2269\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image5.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2269\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5. Length frequency of splittail captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> Note that many splittail spawn in the Sacramento Valley floodplain just upstream of the proposed north Delta WaterFix intakes, and that many of the juvenile splittail emigrating back to the Delta would pass the proposed WaterFix intakes at a size vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2271\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2271\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2271\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image6.jpg 530w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image6-196x300.jpg 196w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 530px) 100vw, 530px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2271\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6. Length frequency of prickly sculpin captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note that the larvae of winter-spring spawning sculpin would be highly vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2272\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2272\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2272\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image7.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2272\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7. Length frequency of native Sacramento sucker captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note that the juveniles of late winter-early spring river spawning suckers return to the Delta at a size vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_2273\" style=\"width: 540px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2273\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2273\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/image8.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"810\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2273\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8. Length frequency of threadfin shad captured in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\">20-mm Survey<\/a> . Note the late spring-early summer spawning threadfin shad are highly vulnerable to entrainment (&lt;20 mm).<\/p><\/div>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-2262'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-2262-1'> WaterFix hearing transcript, 2\/23\/18, Page 124, line 2:\u00a0 Dr. Greenwood testimony at State Board WaterFix hearing. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2262-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2262-2'> <em>Id.<\/em>, Page 156, line 6.\u00a0 Note that many shad and striped bass spawn their buoyant eggs in the area of the proposed intakes and immediately upstream, as well as in the lower Feather, Sacramento, and American rivers.\u00a0 Nearly all the eggs and newly hatched larvae would pass the proposed CWF intakes. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2262-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-2262-3'> Much of the wild salmon production from the American and Feather rivers\u2019 fall-run populations comes from fry (30-50 mm) leaving these rivers in winter.\u00a0 Winter is the peak period of proposed north Delta diversions of the WaterFix project.\u00a0 These fry would not be protected by the proposed WaterFix screens. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-2262-3'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Department of Water Resources\u2019 consultant on in the WaterFix tunnels hearing testified: \u201cBut for those Smelts that are occurring in that area, the North Delta diversions will be designed to fish agency protective standards\u201d\u2026 \u201cThat opening, based on analyses, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=2262\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,6,17,16,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fish-species","category-smelt","category-splittail","category-striped-bass","category-sturgeon"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2262"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2281,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions\/2281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}