{"id":3486,"date":"2021-02-08T20:07:07","date_gmt":"2021-02-09T04:07:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3486"},"modified":"2021-02-08T20:07:07","modified_gmt":"2021-02-09T04:07:07","slug":"butte-creek-spring-run-salmon-status-end-of-year-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3486","title":{"rendered":"Butte Creek Spring Run Salmon \u2013 Status End-of-Year 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When I last reported in <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=1652\">May 2017<\/a> on the status of Butte Creek spring-run Chinook salmon, the population had hit lows as a consequence of the 2013-2015 drought.\u00a0 I am happy to report the run\u2019s rebound after the drought with new reported and revised <a href=\"https:\/\/nrm.dfg.ca.gov\/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=84381\">CDFW escapement estimates<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Following escapement in 2017 that was the lowest since 1998, the population estimate increased to 6253 in 2019 (Figure 1).\u00a0 The spawner-recruit relationship (Figure 2) continues to indicate a positive spawner-recruit relationship, with and positive responses to normal water year 2016 in the 2018 run and to wet water year 2017 in the 2019 run.\u00a0 Though 2018 was a below-normal water year like 2016, the run in 2020 produced by 2018 water conditions has been characterized as small.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-3486-1' id='fnref-3486-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3486)'>1<\/a><\/sup> A small 2020 run may be the consequence of the low number of 2017 spawners.\u00a0 In addition, the devastating 2018 Camp fire in the watershed may have adversely affected the 2020 adult returns and future spawning runs.\u00a0 But overall, the outlook for the 2021 and 2022 runs is promising given the improved number of spawners in 2018 and 2019.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3487\" style=\"width: 1748px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3487\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3487\" src=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1738\" height=\"861\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1.jpg 1738w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1-300x149.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1-1024x507.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1-768x380.jpg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1-1536x761.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte1-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1738px) 100vw, 1738px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-3487\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1. Butte Creek spring-run salmon escapement estimates, 1975-2019.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_3488\" style=\"width: 1408px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3488\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3488\" src=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1398\" height=\"1172\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2.jpg 1398w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2-300x252.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2-1024x858.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2-768x644.jpg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/butte2-358x300.jpg 358w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1398px) 100vw, 1398px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-3488\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Spawner-recruit relationship of spring-run Chinook salmon for Butte Creek. Numbers shown represent recruits (number of returning adults) for year displayed. The color of the number shows the conditions two years previously, when young reared in Butte Creek and then emigrated to the ocean. A red number shows a dry year rearing and emigrating conditions. Blue designates wet year rearing and emigrating conditions. Green designates normal year rearing and emigrating conditions. For example, 17 represents escapement in 2017, while its red color designates drought conditions in 2015.<\/p><\/div>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-3486'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-3486-1'> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.buttecreek.org\">http:\/\/www.buttecreek.org<\/a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-3486-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I last reported in May 2017 on the status of Butte Creek spring-run Chinook salmon, the population had hit lows as a consequence of the 2013-2015 drought.\u00a0 I am happy to report the run\u2019s rebound after the drought with &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3486\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chinook"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3486"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3486\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3491,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3486\/revisions\/3491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}