{"id":3643,"date":"2021-04-19T18:43:24","date_gmt":"2021-04-20T01:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3643"},"modified":"2021-04-19T18:43:24","modified_gmt":"2021-04-20T01:43:24","slug":"summer-shasta-releases-are-too-high-and-lower-sacramento-river-summer-flows-are-too-low-lessons-learned-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3643","title":{"rendered":"Summer Shasta Releases Are Too High and Lower Sacramento River Summer Flows Are Too Low: Lessons Learned \u2013 #5"},"content":{"rendered":"

Following an introductory post, this is the seventh post in a\u00a0<\/em>series<\/em><\/a>\u00a0on the\u00a0<\/em>lessons learned<\/em><\/a>\u00a0by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) from the 2013-2015 drought that devastated Sacramento River salmon populations.\u00a0 This post addresses Lesson #5.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The reason for high summer releases to the Sacramento River from Shasta and Keswick reservoirs is to meet the demands of Sacramento Valley water contractors for stored water.\u00a0 For example, in 2012, summer releases to the Sacramento were 15,000 cfs, with roughly 7000-8000 cfs diverted in the Sacramento Valley for water supply use (Figure 1).<\/p>\n

The Bureau of Reclamation learned during the 2012-2015 drought that, if the previous year was wet, it must still limit water releases in summer of dry years to 12,000-13,000 cfs (Figures 2 and 3) to preserve Shasta Reservoir\u2019s cold-water pool supply.\u00a0 One consequence of this limitation as implemented has been less flow in the lower river 150-200 miles downstream.\u00a0 This reduced flow has exacerbated water temperature problems in the lower river.\u00a0 Reclamation has likely also reduced water deliveries in the Sacramento Valley to some degree, but the extent of any such reductions is difficult to tease out.<\/p>\n

Because of the lessons learned, Reclamation in 2018 targeted a 53o<\/sup>F water temperature limit in the main spawning reach of winter-run salmon from Keswick Dam (RM 300) down to the mouth of Clear Creek (RM290) (Figure 4).\u00a0 In the past, the water temperature limit had been higher (56-58o<\/sup>F).\u00a0 In 2020, the target was once again set higher to sustain a depleted cold-water pool supply through the summer and fall. The target in the spawning reach in drought years 2014 and 2015 was 56o<\/sup>F, which proved ineffective at providing egg\/embryo survival.<\/p>\n

One of the actions to sustain the cold-water pool has been to limit June-July Keswick releases (Figure 5) to near 11,000 cfs in wet years (2017 and 2019).\u00a0 Such action cuts into water supply deliveries and leads to reduced flows (Figure 6) and excessive water temperatures (>70 o<\/sup>F, Figure 7) in the lower 200 miles of river.\u00a0 Without simultaneous reductions in Sacramento Valley water deliveries, reductions in Keswick releases lead to excessive water temperatures downstream of the upper 10-mile salmon spawning reach.\u00a0 \u00a0This violates the Central Valley Basin Plan\u2019s temperature standard for the lower reaches of the Sacramento River (68o<\/sup>F).\u00a0 It causes stress on rearing and migrating salmon and sturgeon, and if high enough severely retards upstream migration of adult salmon.<\/p>\n

The obvious lesson learned is that Reclamation must limit summer Shasta cold-water storage releases and maintain sufficient lower river flows.\u00a0 This will necessarily require Reclamation to more greatly restrict water supply deliveries in the Sacramento Valley than it has historically and recently.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Figure 1.<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 2.<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figures 1-3. Sacramento River flow (cfs) at Keswick Dam (rm 300) and Wilkins Slough (rm 120) in summer of dry years 2012, 2018, and 2020. Note: the difference between<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 4. September-October water temperatures in the upper Sacramento River at Clear Creek (river mile 290) from 2012-2020. Note loss of temperature control in 2014 and 2015. Note limited control in 2013, 2018, and 2020. Note meeting target 53o<\/sup>F 2012, 2016, 2017, and 2019<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 5. Flow rates below Keswick Dam in June-July 2012-2020.<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 6. July-September Sacramento River flow rates at Wilkins Slough (rm 120) 2015-2020. Note flows were compromised in summer 2016 and 2017 to help preserve Shasta\u2019s cold-water pool supply and upper river water supply deliveries.<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 7. Water temperatures in Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough (river mile 120) May-Oct, 2015-2020<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Following an introductory post, this is the seventh post in a\u00a0series\u00a0on the\u00a0lessons learned\u00a0by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) from the 2013-2015 drought that devastated Sacramento River salmon populations.\u00a0 This post addresses Lesson #5. The reason for high summer releases … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chinook","category-water-quality"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3643"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3643\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3654,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3643\/revisions\/3654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}