{"id":3702,"date":"2021-05-31T12:35:42","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T19:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3702"},"modified":"2021-05-31T21:26:36","modified_gmt":"2021-06-01T04:26:36","slug":"upper-sacramento-river-summer-water-temperatures-lesson-6-53of-is-key","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=3702","title":{"rendered":"Upper Sacramento River Summer Water Temperatures – Lesson #6: 53\u00baF Is Key"},"content":{"rendered":"

Following a series of posts, this is the last post in a series<\/a> on the lessons learned<\/a> by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) from the 2013-2015 drought that devastated Sacramento River salmon populations. This post addresses Lesson #6. The will be the last in the series because the past has become the present, and the focus must now shift to drought conditions and management in 2021 and beyond.1<\/a><\/sup><\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The best science is that a 53o<\/sup>F daily-average temperature (DAT) is protective of salmon eggs\/embryos in their gravel redds in the Sacramento River in the spring and summer spawning season.\u00a0 But the Bureau of Reclamation, without enough pushback from NMFS and the State Water Board, continues to manage for higher water temperatures in the 10-mile spawning reach of the Sacramento River from Keswick Dam (River Mile 300) downstream to the mouth of Clear Creek (RM 290).2<\/a><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

A 53o<\/sup>F DAT is close to the 55o<\/sup>F seven-day-average-daily-maximum temperature (7DADM) that NMFS cited in its Lesson #6, quoted above.\u00a0 The Bureau of Reclamation met that target in wet year 2019 (Figure 1).<\/p>\n

Protection was compromised in 2020 (Figure 2), as Reclamation only maintained the 53o<\/sup>F DAT at Clear Creek in the peak mid-summer egg and embryo period.\u00a0 Since the 2019 Biological Opinion, this \u00a0has become Reclamation\u2019s dry-year strategy.\u00a0 This dry-year strategy is a partial improvement over the prior dry-year strategy of 56\u00baF DAT at Clear Creek that Reclamation employed in 2015 (Figure 3), when there was very low over-summer survival of eggs and embryos, and very little fry and smolt production, of winter-run salmon.<\/p>\n

Water temperatures were even higher in May 2021, reaching 58-62o<\/sup>F early in the month (Figure 4).\u00a0 Such temperatures were high enough to compromise the health and reproductive success of the many pre-spawn adults holding below Keswick Dam.\u00a0 First, elevated water temperatures delay spawning.\u00a0 Second, adults have higher disease vulnerability at water temperatures above 60o<\/sup>F.\u00a0 Third, eggs and embryos from holding adults subjected to water temperatures higher than 60o<\/sup>F have higher pre-hatch mortalities and abnormalities.<\/p>\n

With tentative approval by the State Water Board of Reclamation\u2019s draft summer temperature management plan for 2021, we can expect a 56o<\/sup>F DAT at Clear Creek target for the peak June-July egg incubation season.\u00a0 Such operation allows significant hydropower production and water deliveries from Shasta storage releases, as well as water exports from the Trinity River.\u00a0 If these were curtailed, Reclamation could achieve a target of 53o<\/sup>F DAT at Clear Creek and save salmon.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Figure 1. Water temperatures May-October, 2019 in the Sacramento River at Keswick Dam-KWK (RM 300), Redding-SAC (RM 295), Clear Creek-CCR (RM 290), and Balls Ferry-BSF (RM 276).<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 2. Water temperatures May-October, 2020 in the Sacramento River at Keswick Dam-KWK (RM 300), Redding-SAC (RM 295), Clear Creek-CCR (RM 290), and Balls Ferry-BSF (RM 276).<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 3. Water temperatures May-October, 2015 in the Sacramento River at Keswick Dam-KWK (RM 300), Redding-SAC (RM 295), Clear Creek-CCR (RM 290), and Balls Ferry-BSF (RM 276).<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 4. Daily average water temperature in the winter-run salmon spawning reach of the Sacramento River below Keswick Dam (KWK – RM 300) and above Clear Creek (CCR – RM 290) in April-May 2021. Safe level for holding adult salmon for reproduction success is 56\u00baF. The safe level for disease potential in holding adults is 60\u00baF.<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"

Figure 4. Water temperatures in the Sacramento River at the lower end of the spawning reach above Clear Creek (CCR), May 1-May 30, 2021.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
    \n
  1. https:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/stories\/2021\/5\/24\/2031912\/-Endangered-Sacramento-River-winter-Chinook-salmon-are-dying-before-spawning-below-Keswick-Dam<\/a>; https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/local\/environment\/article\/Conservationists-say-time-running-out-to-save-16211851.php#photo-20942693<\/a> ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Note that NMFS recommends monitoring water temperatures at redd locations where temperatures may be higher than at gaging stations. ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Following a series of posts, this is the last post in a series on the lessons learned by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) from the 2013-2015 drought that devastated Sacramento River salmon populations. This post addresses Lesson #6. The … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chinook","category-water-quality"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3702"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3712,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3702\/revisions\/3712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}