{"id":804,"date":"2016-04-03T12:57:41","date_gmt":"2016-04-03T19:57:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=804"},"modified":"2016-04-03T12:57:41","modified_gmt":"2016-04-03T19:57:41","slug":"smelt-update-april-1-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=804","title":{"rendered":"Smelt Update &#8211; April 1, 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since the <a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=683\" target=\"_blank\">last update<\/a>, Delta and longfin smelt have continued their trends of record low numbers, as shown in the most recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/Smelt-Larva-Survey\" target=\"_blank\">Smelt Larvae Survey<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wildlife.ca.gov\/Conservation\/Delta\/20mm-Survey\" target=\"_blank\">20-mm Survey<\/a>. They are not yet gone, but close. It remains to be seen whether the good conditions provided so far in this wet winter 2016 can lead to some form of recovery for these two endangered species.<\/p>\n<h2>Longfin Smelt<\/h2>\n<p>With the high winter flows, the young from this year\u2019s spawn are now distributed well to the west, although some remain in the north Delta (Figure 1). Their numbers continue at record low levels (Figure 2) despite a wet winter.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_805\" style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-805\" class=\"size-full wp-image-805\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image1.png\" alt=\"Figure 1. Longfin smelt catch in mid-March in Survey #1 of 20-mm Survey.\" width=\"642\" height=\"491\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image1.png 642w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image1-300x229.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image1-392x300.png 392w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 642px) 100vw, 642px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-805\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1. Longfin smelt catch in mid-March in Survey #1 of 20-mm Survey.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_806\" style=\"width: 581px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-806\" class=\"size-full wp-image-806\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Average-CPUE-Longfin-Smelt-Graph.png\" alt=\"Figure 2. Average catch-per-unit-effort of young longfin smelt in mid-March 20-mm surveys from 2008-2016.\" width=\"571\" height=\"341\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Average-CPUE-Longfin-Smelt-Graph.png 571w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Average-CPUE-Longfin-Smelt-Graph-300x179.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Average-CPUE-Longfin-Smelt-Graph-500x300.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 571px) 100vw, 571px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-806\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Average catch-per-unit-effort of young longfin smelt in mid-March 20-mm surveys from 2008-2016.<\/p><\/div>\n<h2>Delta Smelt<\/h2>\n<p>Delta smelt have yet to grow into the size range captured in the 20-mm Survey, but remain present in the last Smelt Larvae Survey (Figure 3). High winter through-Delta flows have resulted in a slightly more westward distribution than in recent drought years such as 2013 (Figure 4). Although numbers collected are very low, it is too early to determine relative production for 2016 compared to previous years in the Smelt Larvae Survey or the 20-mm Survey. Under similar wet winter-spring conditions in 2010 and 2011, Delta smelt had modest population improvements. It remains to be seen if the very low adult spawning population this year (in comparison to the populations in 2010 and 2011) can lead to some form of recovery in the population under this year\u2019s relatively wet conditions.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_807\" style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-807\" class=\"size-full wp-image-807\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image3JPG.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 3. Delta smelt larvae catch distribution in mid-March 2016 Smelt Larvae Survey. \" width=\"642\" height=\"491\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image3JPG.jpg 642w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image3JPG-300x229.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image3JPG-392x300.jpg 392w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 642px) 100vw, 642px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-807\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3. Delta smelt larvae catch distribution in mid-March 2016 Smelt Larvae Survey.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_808\" style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-808\" class=\"size-full wp-image-808\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image2.png\" alt=\"Figure 4. Delta smelt larvae catch distribution in mid-March 2013 Smelt Larvae Survey.\" width=\"642\" height=\"491\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image2.png 642w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image2-300x229.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/image2-392x300.png 392w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 642px) 100vw, 642px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-808\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4. Delta smelt larvae catch distribution in mid-March 2013 Smelt Larvae Survey.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since the last update, Delta and longfin smelt have continued their trends of record low numbers, as shown in the most recent Smelt Larvae Survey and 20-mm Survey. They are not yet gone, but close. It remains to be seen &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=804\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bay-delta","category-smelt"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":809,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/804\/revisions\/809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}