{"id":938,"date":"2016-06-08T06:16:10","date_gmt":"2016-06-08T13:16:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=938"},"modified":"2016-06-08T06:16:10","modified_gmt":"2016-06-08T13:16:10","slug":"sturgeon-are-being-decimated-by-water-management-in-spring-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=938","title":{"rendered":"Sturgeon are being Decimated by Water Management in Spring 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Green and White sturgeon spawn in the Sacramento River in spring, usually in April and May. Green sturgeon spawn predominantly above Red Bluff (RM 243) to near Redding (RM 264); they also spawn below Red Bluff, downstream to Hamilton City (RM 200) (see Figure 1). White sturgeon spawn primarily below Hamilton City in the lower river above and below Wilkins Slough (RM 125, downstream of area shown on map). Like other endangered fish in the Central Valley, sturgeon too were hurt during the recent four years of drought <sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-938-1' id='fnref-938-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(938)'>1<\/a><\/sup> by low flows and high water temperatures.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_940\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-940\" class=\"size-large wp-image-940\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1-782x1024.png\" alt=\"Figure 1. Map of the upper Sacramento River Basin (Princeton Ferry to Keswick Dam)\" width=\"584\" height=\"765\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1-782x1024.png 782w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1-229x300.png 229w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1-768x1006.png 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Map-1.png 1277w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-940\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1. Map of the upper Sacramento River Basin (Princeton Ferry to Keswick Dam)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>But this year is supposed to be different. Water Year 2016 is a wetter year (designated \u201cBelow Normal\u201d for Sacramento Valley), and Shasta Reservoir is nearly full. Reclamation\u2019s Central Valley Project should be able to meet the criteria set forth in the Basin Plan, Water Right Order 90-05, and the salmon and green sturgeon Biological Opinion that are designed to maintain habitat for salmon and sturgeon in the Sacramento River. Those criteria have a common element of maintaining Red Bluff (RM 243) spring-summer water temperature below a daily average of 56\u00b0F. The Basin Plan extends the criteria downstream to Hamilton City (RM 200) and adds a 68\u00b0F criterion from there downstream to Sacramento (RM 60) to protect salmon, sturgeon, and other fish. The criteria have been in place for decades, and are based on extensive science. Salmon spawning requires daily average water temperatures below 56\u00b0F. Water temperatures above 68\u00b0F are lethal to juvenile sturgeon.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-938-2' id='fnref-938-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(938)'>2<\/a><\/sup> Governing requirements in each of the documents cited above allow the applicable criteria to be applied further upstream in drier years when Shasta storage and cold-water pool resources are less than adequate.<\/p>\n<p>This year, the responsible agencies have apparently decided that the cold-water pool volume is inadequate despite the fact that Shasta is virtually full. The agencies have set the Control Point at Redding, with a 58\u00b0F daily average limit. By allowing the Red Bluff 56\u00b0F objective to be substantially weakened, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the federal agency responsible for salmon and sturgeon, is thus accepting great risk not only to Winter Run salmon (decimated over the past two years), but also to green and white sturgeon.<\/p>\n<p>To save the Shasta cold-water pool, Reclamation has been releasing a minimum amount of water from Shasta and is taking the water primarily from the upper warm surface layers of the reservoir.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-938-3' id='fnref-938-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(938)'>3<\/a><\/sup> This has resulted in water temperatures in the lower river at Red Bluff in excess of 56\u00b0F (Figure 2). It has also resulted in water temperatures below Red Bluff (Figure 3) that exceed 65\u00b0F, the upper thermal optima for sturgeon embryo development, and even 68\u00b0F, the lethal level for newly hatched sturgeon juveniles.<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-938-4' id='fnref-938-4' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(938)'>4<\/a><\/sup> The warm water in the lower river is also a consequence of unusually low seasonal flows in the lower Sacramento River in spring 2016 (Figures 4 and 5).<\/p>\n<p>May and June are precisely the months of concern for the sturgeon. Sturgeon begin spawning when water temperatures start to exceed 55\u00b0F, which generally occurs in April. Green sturgeon young spawned above Red Bluff pass downstream through Red Bluff in May and June (Figure 6). Those passing Red Bluff and those spawned between Red Bluff and Hamilton City likely encountered their upper thermal optima of 65\u00b0F during May and early June. White sturgeon spawned in the lower river were subjected to lethal water temperature during much of May 2016. Lethal water temperatures predominated in May 2014 and 2015 (Figure 7), Critically Dry years, as well as in Below Normal 2016 (Figures 3 and 7). River flows at Wilkins Slough were also very low in these same years (Figure 5). In contrast, higher flows and lower water temperature were maintained in spring of years 2008-2013, which included four drought years.<\/p>\n<p>The overall risk is greatest to White sturgeon, which spawn in the lower river where water temperatures are highest. That high risk is the result of unusually low seasonal river flows from a seemingly overzealous need by Reclamation to conserve Shasta storage this year. This effect is compounded by the fact that, of the 7000 cfs being releases from Shasta, only 3000 cfs is reaching the lower river. The rest is diverted by Reclamation\u2019s north of Delta contractors, who received 100% of their allocations this year.<\/p>\n<p>The sturgeon deserve 100% of their needs as well. That would require colder water and higher releases from Shasta to get flows at Wilkins Slough into the range of 5000-7000 cfs that was achieved in drought years 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2013 (Figure 5). That would amount to 4000-8000 acre-feet per day (0.1-0.2%\/day) of a nearly full Shasta Reservoir (currently with 4,200,000 acre-feet of stored water). Such releases will be required in any event to meet export demands from the Delta in June.<\/p>\n<p>For more detail on the issue see the following:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.waterboards.ca.gov\/waterrights\/water_issues\/programs\/drought\/sacramento_river\/\">http:\/\/www.waterboards.ca.gov\/waterrights\/water_issues\/programs\/drought\/sacramento_river\/<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.norcalwater.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/swrcb_summary_apr_2014.pdf\">http:\/\/www.norcalwater.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/swrcb_summary_apr_2014.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div id=\"attachment_941\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016..jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-941\" class=\"size-large wp-image-941\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-1024x553.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 2. Water temperature of Sacramento River at Red Bluff (RM 243) in May and early June 2016. Target for salmon and other fish is 56\u00b0F (red line). \" width=\"584\" height=\"315\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-1024x553.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-300x162.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-768x415.jpg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-500x270.jpg 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-2.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Red-Bluff-RM-243-in-May-and-early-June-2016..jpg 1458w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-941\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Water temperature of Sacramento River at Red Bluff (RM 243) in May and early June 2016. Target for salmon and other fish is 56\u00b0F (red line).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_942\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016..jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-942\" class=\"size-large wp-image-942\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-1024x563.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 3. Water temperature of Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) in May and early June 2016. Target for sturgeon and other fish is 68\u00b0F (red line).\" width=\"584\" height=\"321\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-1024x563.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-300x165.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-768x422.jpg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016.-500x275.jpg 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-3.-Water-temperature-of-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-and-early-June-2016..jpg 1447w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-942\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3. Water temperature of Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) in May and early June 2016. Target for sturgeon and other fish is 68\u00b0F (red line).<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_943\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-4.-Daily-average-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-2016..png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-943\" class=\"size-full wp-image-943\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-4.-Daily-average-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-2016..png\" alt=\"Figure 4. Daily average Sacramento River flow at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) in May 2016.\" width=\"640\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-4.-Daily-average-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-2016..png 640w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-4.-Daily-average-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-2016.-300x164.png 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-4.-Daily-average-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-in-May-2016.-500x273.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-943\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4. Daily average Sacramento River flow at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) in May 2016.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_944\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-5.-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-2008-2016.-Circles-denote-unusually-low-flows-2014-2016..jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-944\" class=\"size-full wp-image-944\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-5.-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-2008-2016.-Circles-denote-unusually-low-flows-2014-2016..jpg\" alt=\"Figure 5. Sacramento River flow at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) 2008-2016. Circles denote unusually low flows 2014-2016.\" width=\"600\" height=\"409\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-5.-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-2008-2016.-Circles-denote-unusually-low-flows-2014-2016..jpg 600w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-5.-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-2008-2016.-Circles-denote-unusually-low-flows-2014-2016.-300x205.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-5.-Sacramento-River-flow-at-Wilkins-Slough-RM-125-2008-2016.-Circles-denote-unusually-low-flows-2014-2016.-440x300.jpg 440w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-944\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5. Sacramento River flow at Wilkins Slough (RM 125) 2008-2016. Circles denote unusually low flows 2014-2016.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_945\" style=\"width: 594px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012..jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-945\" class=\"size-large wp-image-945\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012.-1024x544.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 6. Capture patterns of young Green sturgeon in USFWS traps at Red Bluff 2003-2012.\" width=\"584\" height=\"310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012.-1024x544.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012.-300x159.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012.-768x408.jpg 768w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012.-500x266.jpg 500w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-6.-Capture-patterns-of-young-Green-sturgeon-in-USFWS-traps-at-Red-Bluff-2003-2012..jpg 1315w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-945\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6. Capture patterns of young Green sturgeon in USFWS traps at Red Bluff 2003-2012.<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_946\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-7.-Water-temperature-in-the-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-2008-2016.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-946\" class=\"size-full wp-image-946\" src=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-7.-Water-temperature-in-the-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-2008-2016.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 7. Water temperature in the Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough 2008-2016. The Basin Plan objective and the lethal water temperature for young sturgeon of 68\u00b0F is depicted with red line.\" width=\"600\" height=\"407\" srcset=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-7.-Water-temperature-in-the-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-2008-2016.jpg 600w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-7.-Water-temperature-in-the-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-2008-2016-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Figure-7.-Water-temperature-in-the-Sacramento-River-at-Wilkins-Slough-2008-2016-442x300.jpg 442w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-946\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7. Water temperature in the Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough 2008-2016. The Basin Plan objective and the lethal water temperature for young sturgeon of 68\u00b0F is depicted with red line.<\/p><\/div>\n<div class='footnotes' id='footnotes-938'>\n<div class='footnotedivider'><\/div>\n<ol>\n<li id='fn-938-1'> <a href=\"http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=503\">http:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=503<\/a>.  <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-938-1'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-938-2'> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov\/protected_species\/green_sturgeon\/green_sturgeon_life_history.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov\/protected_species\/green_sturgeon\/green_sturgeon_life_history.html<\/a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-938-2'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-938-3'> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usbr.gov\/mp\/cvo\/vungvari\/ShastaTCD2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.usbr.gov\/mp\/cvo\/vungvari\/ShastaTCD2016.pdf <\/a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-938-3'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li id='fn-938-4'> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov\/publications\/protected_species\/other\/green_sturgeon\/8.25.2015_southern_dps_green_sturgeon_5_year_review_2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov\/publications\/protected_species\/other\/green_sturgeon\/8.25.2015_southern_dps_green_sturgeon_5_year_review_2015.pdf<\/a>  <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-938-4'>&#8617;<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Green and White sturgeon spawn in the Sacramento River in spring, usually in April and May. Green sturgeon spawn predominantly above Red Bluff (RM 243) to near Redding (RM 264); they also spawn below Red Bluff, downstream to Hamilton City &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/?p=938\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-northern-california","category-sturgeon"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=938"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/938\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":947,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/938\/revisions\/947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/calsport.org\/fisheriesblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}