Sturgeon Moon #3 – August 30 Blue Moon

August 2023 has come to an end, following the second “Super Moon” of the month – a Blue Moon. The first full moon of the month was called a “Sturgeon Moon,” originally coined in reference to the ease of catching sturgeon in the Great Lakes during a full moon in summer. The cycle began with the quarter moon and neap tide on July 24 until the full moon on August 1.1

This year’s Super Moons have made a mess of San Francisco Bay, as they did in summer 2022. This year’s August moons have again, regrettably, led to a die-off of sturgeon and other Bay fish.2 The Super Moons’ strong tides caused warm water from the Delta to drain into the Bay, making the usually cool Bay unseasonably warm. (The ocean Blob may have added to some of this summer’s warm Bay water.) The warm water and the associated algal blooms (and their die-offs) have led to unprecedented low dissolved oxygen levels in the Bay, which can kill fish.

While the degree of harm has not been as bad as last year’s summer blooms that were aggravated by the 2022 drought, this year’s algal blooms have also harmed fish despite generally beneficial wet-year conditions. Last summer, there was die-off of nearly a thousand adult white sturgeon in the greater San Francisco Bay due to algal blooms. More dead white sturgeon adults also showed up on Bay beaches again this summer.3

The Bay turned warmer under this summer’s Super Moons than under those last summer (Figure 1). Blooms are still happening, as indicated by high turbidities and chlorophyll levels in portions of the Bay (Figures 1-3). The draining of warm Delta water to the Bay just before the 2023 Super Moons (Figures 4 and 5) warmed the Bay (Figure 6). Low dissolved oxygen continues to plague the Bay (Figure 6). The most recent bloom is depicted in Figures 7 and 8.

The summer 2023 Super Moons and their algal blooms make a complicated story, with the effects of various factors implicated in the blooms, and their role in fish die-offs in the Bay, yet to be fully determined. My concern centers on how warm the Delta becomes in summer before it drains into the Bay during the lunar tidal cycles (Figure 9). The lower rivers and Delta received too little flow from major Central Valley reservoirs for a wet year with full reservoirs. This is an increasing trend that deserves a lot more attention to ensure protection of the Bay’s fish and other public trust values. Otherwise, the trend will simply be chocked up to climate change.

Graph of North Bay (San Pablo Bay at Richmond Bridge) water temperature and turbidity in summer 2023.

Figure 1. North Bay (San Pablo Bay at Richmond Bridge) water temperature and turbidity in summer 2023. Note the presence of the three blooms indicated by high turbidity levels (>100 FNUs)

Graph of Chlorophyll levels at Martinez CA gage between East and North San Francisco Bay in summer 2023.

Figure 2. Chlorophyll levels at Martinez CA gage between East and North San Francisco Bay in summer 2023. Note three periods (green circles) of blooms located at this site.

Graph of Chlorophyll levels at Grizzly Bay gage (in northwest East Bay) in summer 2023.

Figure 3. Chlorophyll levels at Grizzly Bay gage (in northwest East Bay) in summer 2023.

Graph of Salinity (EC) at eastern Suisun Bay gage (in east Bay) in summer 2023.

Figure 4. Salinity (EC) at eastern Suisun Bay gage (in east Bay) in summer 2023. Red arrows indicate periods of draining prior to and between full moons.

Graph of Daily average (tidally filtered) discharge at Pittsburg gage in Suisun Bay summer 2023.

Figure 5. Daily average (tidally filtered) discharge at Pittsburg gage in Suisun Bay summer 2023. Red circles indicate drainage rates to Suisun Bay prior to two Super Moons (August 1 and 30).

Graph of Hourly dissolved oxygen levels in Grizzly Bay in summer 2023.

Figure 6. Hourly dissolved oxygen levels in Grizzly Bay in summer 2023. Note inverse relationship with chlorophyll levels in Figure 4. The low dissolved oxygen levels (<5 mg/l) began with the first bloom (August 1) and continued through August. Also note the Bay water quality standard is a minimum 6 mg/l dissolved oxygen level for fish health.

Satellite imagery of chlorophyll levels in San Francisco Bay on 8/29/2023.

Figure 7. Satellite imagery of chlorophyll levels in San Francisco Bay on 8/29/2023.

Graph of water temperature, chlorophyll, and salinity in Suisun Bay in summer 2023.

Figure 8. Water temperature, chlorophyll, and salinity in Suisun Bay in summer 2023. Note algal bloom in late August that began after the late-August draining of the Delta into the Bay when water temperatures reached 24oC (75oF).

Graph of San Francisco Bay water temperatures from 2007-2023.

Figure 9. San Francisco Bay water temperatures from 2007-2023. Note 2023 reached 70oF (see Figure 2) a recent record reached not even reached in critical drought years 2014, 2015, and 2022.

  1. Spring tides always happen when the Moon is at the full or new phase, which is when the Sun, Moon and Earth are in alignment. Neap tides occur around the first and last quarter phase of the Moon, when the Moon’s orbit around Earth brings it perpendicular to the Sun.
  2. https://calsport.org/fisheriesblog/?p=4398
  3. https://www.sfchronicle.com/climate/article/fishkill-18279379.php

Sturgeon Moon 2 – August 30

In an August 9 post, I described the effects on San Francisco Bay and its sturgeon from the August 1 Sturgeon Moon.  I hypothesized that the draining of warm water from the Delta into the Bay over several days of the strong neap tide during the Sturgeon Moon caused an algae bloom and unseasonably warm water in the Bay (Figure 1) that was killing sturgeon, as it had in summer 2022.  I blamed the warm water on low river flows and high water diversions in the Central Valley that caused the Delta to reach 75oF and the Bay to subsequently reach an unprecedented 72-73oF.  The warm water, abundant sunshine, and generally high nutrients caused the bloom and the low dissolved oxygen levels that resulted in fish dying.

These events are about to reoccur with the August 30 Super Moon.  Once again, warm water will drain from the Delta on several days of strong neap tides the week before the Super Moon (probably around August 24).   The bloom should appear about August 28, about two days before the full moon.

The key question is how warm the Delta will be when it drains into the Bay.  This depends on air temperatures, river flows, and Delta outflow (the product of reservoir releases, Delta inflow, and water diversions).  With an expected general heat wave August 14-17, there is reason to be concerned that water draining from the Delta could be warm once again.

There have been several mitigating factors since the August 1 Super Moon.  Reservoir releases have increased slightly over the past month (Figure 2).  The strength of the spring and neap tides has decreased slightly following the August 1 full moon (Figure 2).  Higher Delta inflows (Freeport) have reduced Delta water temperatures slightly (Figure 3).

To minimize the strength of the potential bloom, warming, and fish die-off in the Bay, it is essential to keep Delta water temperatures down before the August 25-26 neap tide.  Several interdependent actions come to mind: (1) Increase lower Sacramento River flows over the next 10 days by several thousand cfs to get Wilkins Slough water temperatures down to about 68oF.  (2) Ensure that the extra Wilkins flow reaches the Delta at Freeport to keep Delta inflow up several thousand cfs.  (3) Increase Delta outflow during the August 22-24 spring tide by reducing south Delta exports, to minimize the build-up of warm water in the Delta prior to when the Delta drains to the Bay on the August 25-26 neap tide.

These actions will hopefully minimize the damage caused by Central Valley water management to the Bay ecosystem and specifically to the white sturgeon population during the next Super Moon cycle.

Satellite image

Figure 1. San Francisco Bay algae bloom on July 30, 2023. Source

Graphs showing Delta inflow (Freeport) and Delta outflow to Bay in week since the August 1 Super Moon.

Figure 2. Delta inflow (Freeport) and Delta outflow to Bay in week since the August 1 Super Moon. Note the spring tide has gotten slightly stronger and Delta inflows have increased (due to increased Folsom and Oroville reservoir releases)

Graph showing Delta inflow (tidally filtered and hourly) from the Sacramento River and water temperature at Freeport July-August 2023.

Figure 3. Delta inflow (tidally filtered and hourly) from the Sacramento River and water temperature at Freeport July-August 2023.

Graph showing Lower Sacramento River streamflow and water temperature at Wilkins Slough gage July-August 2023. Water temperature remains high (>20C, 68 F) under low streamflow.

Figure 4. Lower Sacramento River streamflow and water temperature at Wilkins Slough gage July-August 2023. Water temperature remains high (>20oC, 68oF) under low streamflow.

Sturgeon Moon August 2023

It is August 2023, and the month will feature two “Super Moons.” The first full moon is called a “Sturgeon Moon,” originally coined in reference to the ease of catching sturgeon in the Great Lakes during a full moon in summer.1 Its cycle began with the quarter moon and neap tide on July 24 until the full moon on August 1.2 This year’s Sturgeon Moon was regrettably prophetic in that it coincided with a new sturgeon die-off in San Francisco Bay in summer 2023.

Last summer, there was die-off of nearly a thousand adult white sturgeon in the greater San Francisco Bay due to a toxic algae bloom. More dead white sturgeon adults have been showing up on Bay beaches again this summer.3 After analyzing data related to the die-off, I now blame the white sturgeon die-off on the Sturgeon Moon (i.e., the tides) and some complicit factors.

Why are toxic algae blooms occurring, and sturgeon dying, again this year, in a wet flood year? Toxic blooms are not supposed to occur in wet years.

Based on the information available, this summer’s die-off event is occurring during a Sturgeon Moon. The Sturgeon Moon cycle (that occurred in late July and early August this year around the August 1 full moon) causes the Delta to rapidly fill from the Bay and stop flowing (termed a spring tide). In the recent heat, all that water in the Delta and lower rivers heated up to 75ºF. Then the Sturgeon Moon cycle drained (neap tide) the Delta into the Bay. When the top three feet or so of warm Delta water all drained into the Bay, it triggered the toxic algae bloom, low oxygen, and hot water. In combination, these factors are killing the fish.

Sturgeon likely suffered their initial stress from the warm lower rivers where they spawned in May. By the time of the Sturgeon Moon, many had moved downstream into the Delta toward the cooler Bay. The emptying of the warm Delta into the Bay during the neap tide likely stimulated further movement into the Bay. Once in the Bay, the stressed sturgeon received added stress from the warm Bay and its new toxic algae bloom and hypoxia conditions. The accumulated stress from the whole series of events likely caused the die-offs observed in the past two summers.

Yes, the Sturgeon Moon, Bay pollution, and algae seeds from last years bloom played a part, but the biggest culprits were state and federal water managers, who allowed the rivers and Delta to heat up in early summer by making high water deliveries upstream of the Delta and exporting high volumes of water from the Delta.

I worry about the accuracy of the loss estimates of adult white sturgeon in the Bay. As noted in the Chronicle article cited and linked above, there may be many dead sturgeon that have gone undetected at the bottom of the Bay. Last year, as many as 1000 sturgeon were found dead. There are probably less than 10,000 adult white sturgeon left in the Bay-Delta spawning population. Sport fishermen generally harvest about a thousand each year. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Fish and Game Commission are revisiting fishing regulations this fall and may close or restrict the popular sport fishery. 4

Could these circumstances have been avoided? Yes. First by maintaining lower Sacramento River and Delta inflow temperatures (Figure 1) at or below the state water quality standard of 68ºF (20ºC) with adequate flows (greater dam releases and/or less water deliveries). The lower Sacramento River flow of 5000 cfs is far too low for early summer, especially in a wet year. Second, by maintaining Delta temperatures at least in the 20-22ºC range (there is no Delta water temperature standard) with adequate cool inflows. Third, by maintaining water temperatures in Bay below 20ºC with adequate cool Delta outflow during the spring tides. This solution would have been difficult to achieve in drought year 2022, but not in flood year 2023.

Water project managers should have foreseen the tidal patterns coming in the summer (Figure 2) and the inadequacy of the estimated flows they were providing to the Delta (Figure 3). Measured Delta outflow by USGS was actually lower than the DWR model predictions (Figure 4). Instead, water managers provided approximately 20,000 cfs of water deliveries, including near-maximum export pumping from the Delta (Figure 5). The upstream pull to the south Delta export pumps reached a peak near 10,000 cfs in interior Delta channels at the end of July (Figure 6).

The influx of warm water reached a peak at the maximum ebb tide on July 24. This can be seen in Figure 7 at the Carquinez Bridge gage, and Figure 8 in Suisun Bay. Evidence of the Bay bloom can be seen in Figure 9, as the North Bay water returned to the East Bay with its algae (chlorophyll) concentrations and low dissolved oxygen at the end of July, coinciding with the return of the spring tide. Further evidence of the bloom is indicated in Figure 10 in the low nitrogen concentrations at the end of July in Suisun Bay.

In summary, the recent reappearance of a die-off of white sturgeon in the Bay appears to have been triggered by the strong tides of the summer Sturgeon Moon draining warm water from the Delta into the Bay. The warm water, in turn, was the result of excessive water diversions upstream of the Delta and near-maximum water exports from the Delta, combined with tidal dynamics.

Graph showing flow and water temperature in the lower Sacramento River upstream of the Delta at Wilkins Slough (WLK) and at the entrance to the tidal Delta at Freeport (FPT). Red line is water quality standard for lower Sacramento River.

Figure 1. Flow and water temperature in the lower Sacramento River upstream of the Delta at Wilkins Slough (WLK) and at the entrance to the tidal Delta at Freeport (FPT). Red line is water quality standard for lower Sacramento River.

Graph showing Average daily flow and hourly stage at Rio Vista in North Delta near exit to the Bay.

Figure 2. Average daily flow and hourly stage at Rio Vista in North Delta near exit to the Bay. Note the sharp flow increase and the drop in stage on 7/24 (Delta draining under the neap tide of the initial quarter of the Sturgeon Moon.)

Graph showing Stable Delta conditions in July 2023. Inflows = (American River AFO + Lower Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough WLK + lower Feather River at Gridley GRL + lower San Joaquin river at Mossdale MSD. Outflow (DWR-DTO) = Inflow – exports. Note relatively stable conditions.

Figure 3. Stable Delta conditions in July 2023. Inflows = (American River AFO + Lower Sacramento River at Wilkins Slough WLK + lower Feather River at Gridley GRL + lower San Joaquin river at Mossdale MSD. Outflow (DWR-DTO) = Inflow – exports. Note relatively stable conditions. Note DWR outflow is calculated (not measured) from daily flows.

Graph showing Delta outflow as estimated by USGS from flow gages.

Figure 4. Delta outflow as estimated by USGS from flow gages. Note drop in Delta outflow (at the peaks in spring tides) beginning on 7/24 as shown in Figure 2, but not in Figure 3. Also note the peak outflows were higher in USGS outflows.

Graph showing South Delta SWP and CVP exports June-July 2023.

Figure 5. South Delta SWP and CVP exports June-July 2023. Note 20,000 acre-ft per day is approximately hourly average of 10,000 cfs. Maximum export rate is 11,400 cfs (approximately 23,000 acre-ft per day).

Graph showing Old and Middle River flows toward export pumps in south Delta.

Figure 6. Old and Middle River flows toward export pumps in south Delta.

Graph showing Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and turbidity at Crockett in north Bay in June-July 2023.

Figure 7. Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and turbidity at Crockett in north Bay in June-July 2023. Note neap tide and lower salinity, warm, clear water on 7/24-25.

Graph showing Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and turbidity at Port Chicago in east Bay in June-July 2023.

Figure 8. Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and turbidity at Port Chicago in east Bay in June-July 2023. Note neap tide and lower salinity and warmer water on 7/22-25.

Graph showing Salinity (EC), dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll concentration in east Bay in June-July 2023.

Figure 9. Salinity (EC), dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll concentration in east Bay in June-July 2023. Note bloom, higher salinity, low dissolved oxygen beginning on 7/25.

Graph showing Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and total nitrogen at Pittsburg in east Bay in June-July 2023.

Figure 10. Salinity (EC), water temperature (C), and total nitrogen at Pittsburg in east Bay in June-July 2023. Note higher salinity and water temperature, and reduced nitrogen (from algae uptake) beginning on 7/24-25.

  1. Two supermoons will light up the night sky in August. Here’s what you need to know https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/supermoons-two-blue-sturgeon-18270736.php
  2. Spring tides always happen when the Moon is at the full or new phase, which is when the Sun, Moon and Earth are in alignment. Neap tides occur around the first and last quarter phase of the Moon, when the Moon’s orbit around Earth brings it perpendicular to the Sun.
  3. https://www.sfchronicle.com/climate/article/fishkill-18279379.php
  4. https://ncgasa.org/2023/04/17/white-sturgeon-meeting-and-overview-from-cdfw/

Feather River Salmon Recovery Responsibilities, Commitments, and Recommendations

The State Water Project (SWP) is not protecting salmon in the Feather River.  The Feather River’s once-prolific populations of wild spring-run and fall-run salmon have been replaced by smaller numbers of hatchery fish of inferior genetic composition.

The fact that the replacement of wild fish by hatchery fish plagues all salmon stocks in the Central Valley Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) is no excuse.  The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has many responsibilities and commitments to protect Feather River salmon under the SWP’s project’s hydropower license, water rights, and other permits, and more generally under the public trust doctrine and the reasonable use doctrine in the state constitution (Article X, Section 2).  The SWP has not met these responsibilities or related commitments since the SWP’s completion in the 1960s.

Neither Feather River nor Central Valley salmon recovery can be achieved without cleaning up the mess in the lower Feather River.  This fact is recognized widely in salmon recovery plans, federal biological opinions, State incidental take permits, and even in part in the Oroville Settlement Agreement for the relicensing of the SWP’s hydroelectric facilities at Oroville.  DWR has made many promises and commitments toward salmon recovery, but has realized very few.  While DWR has spent billions on upgrading project infrastructure, especially after the 2017 spillway failure, it has spent little toward salmon recovery.

So how should DWR focus its salmon recovery process for the Feather River at this point?

Well, most certainly on mandatory provisions in the soon-to-be issued FERC hydropower license and related State Board water quality certification.  Also, on existing or needed conditions in its water right permits that extend beyond the small geographic scope of the FERC license.  The next focus should be on  the “Habitat Expansion Agreement for Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook Salmon and California Central Valley Steelhead” (HEA) that DWR and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) agreed to during the Oroville relicensing.1 There are also requirements in the Reasonable and Prudent Measures in the 2016 federal biological opinion for the Oroville relicensing.

The overall focus should be on recommendations in specific salmon recovery plans pertaining to the project.

Below are my recommendations for top priority actions for Feather River salmon recovery from among the sources mentioned above.

Spring-Run and Fall-Run Salmon Introgression

A primary focus and priority should be on minimizing introgression of the spring-run and fall-run salmon populations in the hatchery and natural spawning area of the 8-mile Low Flow Channel (LFC) downstream of Oroville Dam.

For the natural spawning area of the LFC, one option is a segregation weir at the lower end above the Thermalito Afterbay outlet that would provide for selective passage of selected adult spawners into the spawning area.  Similar weir systems are operated in lower Battle Creek and lower Butte Creek.  For example, the weir could provide seasonal passage to accommodate only spring-run spawners that arrive earlier than fall-run.  The fall-run would be forced to spawn downstream of the afterbay outlet in the High Flow Channel (HFC) where habitat conditions, especially water temperatures, would be more suitable later in the year when fall-run salmon are spawning.  The weir could also trap fish to allow direct segregation or egg taking, or trapping-and-hauling of selected adults or offspring produced in the LFC.

The hatchery program should focus on broodstock selection and hatchery operations that produce returning adult spring-run and fall-run salmon of the highest genetic integrity possible.   It should also operate to limit straying of Feather River origin hatchery salmon.  Hatchery operations should also focus on strategies for smolt releases that provide the greatest return while limiting effects on wild salmon.  Otherwise, the Feather River Fish Hatchery Improvement Program (Article A107 of the Oroville Settlement Agreement) should be implemented.  This program sets specific targets for hatchery temperatures, requires development of a hatchery management program (including a Hatchery and Genetics Management Plan), potential installation of a water supply disinfection system, and funding for annual hatchery operations and maintenance.

Lower Feather River Habitat Improvements

There are many potential habitat improvements in the LFC and in the High Flow Channel (HFC, the lower Feather River downstream of the outlet of Thermalito Afterbay).  Habitat improvements could provide significant benefits to adult salmon holding and spawning success, and wild fry survival and smolt production.  One general category is water quality (i.e., water temperature) and streamflow management through improved infrastructure and operations strategies of flow releases to the LFC and HFC.  The second category is improvements to the physical (non-flow) habitat features, including channel configuration (depths, velocities, and substrate composition) in both the LFC and HFC.

Flow and Water Temperature

Adult spring-run salmon migrate in spring to the lower Feather River, then hold in deep pools over the summer to spawn in early fall.  Adequate flows and cool water temperatures are essential elements of (1) spring adult migration habitat in the lower Feather River and (2) over-summering holding habitat.  Without adequate flows for migration and holding, adult salmon are prone to disease and pre-spawn mortality, poor reproductive success, or lower survival of eggs.  Water temperatures should be no higher than 65oF during migration and 60oF during holding to minimize such detrimental effects.  Water temperatures in the HFC (or LFC) should not exceed 65oF in spring (Figure 1).  Water temperatures in the LFC should not exceed 60oF in summer (Figure 2).  The various planning documents outline potential options to reduce water temperatures in the LFC and HFC.  These include measures to sustain Oroville Reservoir’s cold-water pool and reliably release water from it.  They also include measures to keep water in the Afterbay complex cooler prior to release into the HFC.  Still other measures may include limiting release of water from the Afterbay through a variety of modifications to facilities and operations.

Physical Habitat Features

The Biological Opinion and Settlement Agreement for the Oroville relicensing include prescriptions for the restoration and enhancement of lower Feather River salmon habitat, consistent with the NMFS Salmon Recovery Plan:

  1. Design and build infrastructure and stream channel features that will allow for segregation and reproductive isolation between fall-run and spring-run Chinook salmon naturally spawning in the LFC of the Feather River.
  2. Develop a spawning gravel budget and introduction plan, and implement the plan.
  3. Design, construct, and maintain side-channel and off-channel habitats for spawning and rearing salmon and steelhead.
  4. Obtain river riparian and floodplain habitat through easements and/or land acquisition as needed, allowing the river room to grow and move as necessary to provide key transition habitats, and to minimize degradation (such as channel incisions/filling and substrate armoring) of existing high quality habitat features. Provide a balance between the needs of flood conveyance, recreation, and aquatic, riparian and floodplain habitat in and near an urban environment.
  5. Design, build, and maintain channel features that provide optimum habitat, fish passage, and flood control necessary to minimize scour and erosion. High-flow floodplain channels may be such a feature.
  6. Provide deeper holding habitat and cover for adult over-summering spring-run salmon in the channel habitat features described above. Such habitat is often larger pools with a large bubble curtain at the head, underwater rocky ledges, and shade cover throughout the day. Adult spring-run Chinook salmon may also seek cover in smaller “pocket” water behind large rocks in fast water runs.

Benefits to Other Species

Efforts to improve salmon habitat in the lower Feather River will benefit other important native fish.

The lower Feather River is home to other significant fisheries resources including the following:

  • Spawning anadromous steelhead – spawning is concentrated in Low Flow Channel below the Fish Barrier Dam in winter and spring.
  • Steelhead eggs in gravel redds are concentrated in Low Flow Channel below the Fish Barrier Dam in winter and spring.
  • Steelhead yearling smolts rearing occurs in the Low Flow Channel and the High Flow Channel in winter and spring.
  • Steelhead fry rearing occurs in the Low Flow Channel and the High Flow Channel in winter and spring.
  • Spawning of green and white sturgeon occurs in spring in the High Flow Channel.
  • Sturgeon eggs are found in rock crevices of the river bottom in the High Flow Channel in spring.
  • The newly hatched larvae and fry of sturgeon occur on the river bottom in the High Flow Channel in spring.
  • Resident trout and non-salmonid fish occur year-round throughout the lower Feather River.

Habitat Expansion Agreement – Final Habitat Expansion Plan

The Oroville Project Habitat Expansion Agreement (HEA) requires creation of habitat suitable to increase populations of Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon by a minimum of 2000 adults.  The Habitat Expansion Plan proposed by DWR and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) focuses on physical habitat improvements to the Lower Yuba River to benefit spring-run Chinook salmon.   According to DWR and PG&E, this would develop a viable, self-sustaining population of spring-run Chinook salmon below Englebright Dam.

In my opinion, this is a big mistake.  The lower Yuba River below Englebright Dam has many of the same problems as the lower Feather.  Its spawning habitat already has capacity for many more spring-run salmon than are currently utilizing it.

A much better option is saving the Butte Creek spring-run salmon, the largest core population of the CV Spring Run Salmon ESU.  A first phase of a Butte Creek recovery program would be to secure Butte Creek’s supply of cold Feather River water for the immediate future.  PG&Es decommissioning of the DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project would potentially eliminate or reduce cold-water inputs from the West Branch of the Feather River to Butte Creek.  The DeSabla Project moves water from the West Branch Feather in canals for release into Butte Creek through the DeSabla Powerhouse.  This additional, relatively cool water provides holding and spawning habitat that presently sustains Butte Creek’s spring-run salmon and supports Butte Creek’s fall-run salmon and steelhead.

A second phase of a Butte Creek recovery program would entail removal of the Lower Centerville Diversion Dam, a low-head dam on Butte Creek just downstream of the DeSabla powerhouse (Figure 3).  Since 2014, this dam has not diverted any water.  Removal of the dam and diversion, and potentially removal or modification of other fish passage improvements at natural barriers if needed, could allow access to many miles of upstream spawning and rearing habitat on Butte Creek.  This would truly expand spring-run habitat in the Central Valley.

Summary and Conclusion

Feather River salmon recovery should proceed through improvements in flow, water quality, and physical habitat, project operations and facilities, and hatchery operations and facilities.  Habitat expansion for spring-run salmon should focus on saving the existing run of spring-run salmon on Butte Creek and expanding their upstream range, not on physical improvements to the lower Yuba River.

Figure 1. Water temperature in the lower Feather River within the HFC in spring 2020 and 2021. Red line is upper water temperature safe limit for migrating salmon.

Figure 2. Water temperature in the lower Feather River within the LFC, 2013 and 2021. Red line is upper water temperature safe limit for pre-spawn, adult holding salmon.

Figure 3. Map of PG&E DeSabla Hydroelectric Project features on Butte Creek and the West Branch of the Feather River.

The Forgotten Green Sturgeon

Adult Green Sturgeon and General Life History –  Source

The Southern Green Sturgeon is an anadromous fish species that spawns in the upper Sacramento River near Red Bluff CA.  It is a state and federal listed endangered species.  Adults migrate from the ocean to spawn in April-May in gravel/cobble riffles and pools.1  The eggs hatch in approximately 12 days.  The young larval or fry are susceptible to stress and mortality if water temperature warm too quickly into the 65-70oF range.  Optimal water temperatures for embryos and larvae are 60-65oF.2  Survival declines at higher temperatures, with 68oF considered lethal.

The fry grow quickly and begin moving downstream from mid-May to mid-July, as shown by screw trap collections at the Red Bluff Diversion Dam (Figures 1 and 2).  It is the reaches below Red Bluff downstream into the middle river near Wilkins Slough where larvae-fry are vulnerable to excessive spring-season water temperatures.  There are minimal available records of juvenile survival in the middle and lower river, although some data indicate they do not move to the Delta and Bay until the first fall rains.

Juvenile production measured at Red Bluff is lower in drought years (Figure 2) as a consequence of low flows and high water temperatures. With water temperatures already high in early May 2021 (Figure 3), the prognosis for young green sturgeon production is not good.

Figure 1. Screw traps at Red Bluff Diversion Dam in Sacramento River. USFWS photo.

Figure 2. Green sturgeon collections in Red Bluff screw traps 2003-2012. Note poor survival in drought years 2007 through 2009. Source.

Figure 3. Water temperature of the Sacramento River at Red Bluff (RDB rm 240) and Wilkins Slough (WLK rm 125) April-June in 2014, 2015, and 2021. Note the lethal water temperature for green sturgeon larvae is considered to be 68oF.

 

  1. Brown, K. Evidence of spawning by green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris, in the upper Sacramento River, California. Environ Biol Fish 79, 297–303 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9085-5
  2. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/bay_delta/california_waterfix/exhibits/docs/petitioners_exhibit/dwr/part2/DWR-1102%20Van%20Eenennaam%20et%20al.%202005.pdf