Category Archives: Fish (general)

CDFW proposes to close the Sacramento River above Redding to sport fishing from April 27 to July 31

Posted on by

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife proposes to close fishing in the 5.5 miles of the Sacramento River above Hwy 44 Bridge from April 27-July 31 this year.1 These upper few miles of the river below Keswick Dam provide a world-class sport fishery for rainbow trout (salmon fishing in this river reach is permanently closed). The premise of the ban is to reduce mortality on endangered Winter Run Chinook Salmon. The reach is where most of the Winter Run spawn, eggs incubate, and fry emerge in gravels from late spring through early fall (Figure 1). Last summer 95% of the 2014 Winter Run brood year perished from redd dewatering and high water temperatures.

The proposed closure would inappropriately place the drought-management burden on sport anglers when the problem is poor water management in the present drought. The low flows and high water temperatures in 2014 were caused by depletion of Shasta Reservoir’s cold-water pool to meet water demands of Central Valley Project Settlement Contractors in the Sacramento Valley. These senior water rights holders received 1.3 million acre-ft of Shasta storage during 2014. An additional 110,000 acre-ft released was sold to south of Delta contractors via water transfers from July through November. Shasta Reservoir storage peaked last year near 2.4 million acre-ft in early May, then declined to 1.1 million acre-ft in October.

Shasta Reservoir releases were over 6000 cfs from early May through August (Figure 2). Most of the Winter Run spawned in June and July at flows in excess of 8000 cfs. During the August through September incubation period, flows fell to near 4000 cfs, resulting in the dewatering of many salmon redds. Redd dewatering coupled with high water temperatures resulted in the loss of 95% of the brood year production during September, according to CDFW and NMFS.

Closing the fishery this summer implies that sport fishing activities would otherwise contribute to Winter Run mortality when there is no scientific evidence to support this assumption. Boat traffic is mainly drift boats, which minimally disturb fish. The most obvious risk from fishermen would be trampling redds in the low water period in the August-September incubation period, which is not included in the proposed ban. Even that risk is low, since few anglers wade the spawning reaches.

DFW’s blog states: “Given the gravity of the current situation, it is imperative that each and every adult fish be given maximum protection.”2
The “maximum protection” standard would be much better applied if the Department unequivocally supported measures to protect all life stages of Winter Run. Instead of burdening sport fishermen with the proposed ban, the solution is for the State Water Board to reduce deliveries from Lake Shasta to water contractors this summer. If releases had been cut by a third from May-July last year, the Winter Run could have been saved. Yes, this would have come at a substantial cost to state’s agricultural production (Settlement contractors were already cut 25%), but the drought is unprecedented. Winter Run salmon extinction should not be the price paid to keep rice production high this year in the Sacramento Valley.

Figure 1. Water temperature (degrees F) in Redding reach below Keswick Dam (KWK) in 2014, along with percent of Winter Run life stage present. Red line shows water temperature where egg/alevin survival is less than 50%. Source: NMFS

Figure 1. Water temperature (degrees F) in Redding reach below Keswick Dam (KWK) in 2014, along with percent of Winter Run life stage present. Red line shows water temperature where egg/alevin survival is less than 50%. Source: NMFS

Figure 2. Shasta Reservoir releases from April through October 2014.

Figure 2. Shasta Reservoir releases from April through October 2014.

Are Longfin Smelt Going Extinct?

Posted on by

long fin smelt

Longfin Smelt are a native Bay-Delta fish and are listed under the California Endangered Species Act as “threatened”. Like the Delta Smelt, Longfin have undergone dramatic declines over the past several decades starting with the 1987-92 drought, then the 2001-2005 dry period, the 2007-09 drought, and the most recent 2012-15 drought (Figure 1). A strong recovery occurred in the wet years of 1995-2000. Modest recoveries occurred in 2006 and 2011 (wet years).

The Winter Kodiak Trawl Survey of adult Longfin Smelt provides the first clue as to how the population is faring in the 2015 drought after the second lowest fall index on record. The number of adult Longfin captured in the three winter surveys (Jan-Mar) are low but not unlike other low abundance years in the past decade (Figure 2).

Another indicator is results of the Smelt Larval Survey. The abundance and distribution of larvae in the Bay-Delta is representative of spawning success and potential of this year’s production to contribute to the population. So far in March 2015, survey capture densities have been generally below 100 per 1000 cubic meter sampled (Figures 3 and 4). These densities were slightly lower than for the same surveys in 2014 (Figures 5 and 6). Much higher densities occurred in years 2009-2013 (not shown).

The Juvenile or 20-MM Smelt Survey is another indicator of how Longfin Smelt are faring. Its first survey was recently completed (Figure 7), and the densities are again down from 2014 (Figure 8). Densities in 2014 and 2015 are again significantly lower than in surveys over the previous decade (not shown).

Based on these trends, we can expect another poor recruitment year, perhaps even a record low Fall Index. The population was able to rebound after low Fall indices in 1992 and 2007. It remains to be seen whether the population can rebound after declining since 2006 and after record low numbers of larvae and juveniles in 2014 and 2015. As in 2014, water quality standards for Delta outflow and exports, as well as salinity, have been relaxed, which will further stress the population toward possible extinction. This “canary in the coal mine” for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary, like the Delta Smelt, remains on “life support”.

We will keep you posted as to how the year progresses for Longfin Smelt. To keep up to date on upcoming surveys, check out CDFW’s web site. (https://www.dfg.ca.gov/delta/data/)

Longfin Smelt Fall Midwater Trawl Index – 1967-2013.

Figure 1. Longfin Smelt Fall Midwater Trawl Index – 1967-2013. The 2014 Index was 16. (CDFW data)

Figure 2. Catch of adult Longfin Smelt in Winter Kodiak Trawl Survey, Jan-Mar 2015.

Figure 2. Catch of adult Longfin Smelt in Winter Kodiak Trawl Survey, Jan-Mar 2015.

Figure 3. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #5, early March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 3. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #5, early March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 4. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #6, late March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 4. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #6, late March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 5. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #5, early March 2014. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 5. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #5, early March 2014. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 6. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #6, late March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 6. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in Smelt Larval Survey #6,
late March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 7. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in 20-mm Survey #1, mid March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 7. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in 20-mm Survey #1, mid March 2015. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 8. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in 20-mm Survey #1, mid March 2014. (CDFW data summary)

Figure 8. Longfin Smelt catch distribution in 20-mm Survey #1, mid March 2014. (CDFW data summary)

Mokelumne River Steelhead Management

Posted on by

The Mokelumne Hatchery releases approximately 100-200 thousand hatchery steelhead to the lower Mokelumne each winter, yet runs remain small with several hundred fish or less.  Why is that?  The answer is pretty straightforward:  the smolts released have little chance to reach the ocean and those that do have little chance finding the Mokelumne on their return as adults.

The figure below depicts the primary causal mechanism.  With the Delta Cross Channel closed in winter and spring, the smolts and adults must migrate via the lower San Joaquin River.  The problem is that flows in the San Joaquin below the Mokelumne forks are negative in drier years because of Delta exports.  The negative flows are shown as the red arrow at Prisoners Point.

Mokelumne Steelhead Migration

Wild and hatchery smolts reaching the San Joaquin follow the river “downstream” to the South Delta export pumps.  Many of the approximately 1800 hatchery smolts “salvaged” since February at the export pumping plants are likely Mokelumne hatchery smolts released in February near Lodi.

Likewise, adult steelhead migrating upstream from the Bay into the Delta in winter and spring cannot find the Mokelumne because its water signature in drier years has been taken almost entirely to the South Delta export pumps.

Solutions:

  1. Hatchery smolts can be barged from the Mokelumne Forks to the upper Bay. Some trucking to the Bay has been attempted in past years.
  2. Wild smolts can be collected at Woodbridge Dam traps in drier years and transported to the upper Bay.
  3. Adults returning in winter and spring should be provided olfactory attraction by insuring minimum positive daily average downstream flows in the lower San Joaquin at Prisoners Point and Jersey Point at least for a portion of each month in winter and spring.
  4. In the long term, spring operations at the Delta export pumps need to be reduced so that outmigrating salmon and steelhead from the San Joaquin basin as well as the Mokelumne follow water from their natal rivers to the Bay, not to the pumps.

American River Steelhead Management

Posted on by

14" Wild SteelheadThe 14-inch “half-pounder” hatchery steelhead in photo at right was caught in the lower American River in early March. It was likely one of 430 thousand stocked last June into the American River as fingerlings when Nimbus hatchery water was predicted to be too warm to sustain the fish through the summer. “Half pounder” is the name given to young steelhead that spend a few months in coastal waters before returning as premature adults to their natal rivers. This fish actually weighed about a pound. This “half-pounder” life history strategy is more frequent in North Coast steelhead, and may reflect the Eel River origin of the American River hatchery stock.1

Other young hatchery steelhead from last June’s releases have remained in the river and are about 12 inches in length. These “smolts” have yet to go to ocean. If they had been released from the hatchery normally in February, they would only be about 8-10 inches (four to the pound). Instead, they flourished in the lower American, feasting on aquatic insects, salmon eggs and fry, and other abundant food. They are common throughout the upper 10-miles of river below salmon spawning riffles. Winter water temperatures (50-55F) and flows have been ideal for growth. Last summer’s water temperatures remained near optimal (<68F) all summer in the upper portion of the ten mile reach, while reaching 72-74F on occasion in the lower reach (USGS gage data). At one inch soon after birth, they have grownabout one inch per month, which is ideal for trout and yoFishermenung steelhead.The native American River steelhead are “spring” run like the many larger fresh (bright) adults I have caught over the past two decades in the river from March-June. The bright steelhead at left was caught in June. Whether a remnant run or some genetic material remains in the population from these fish is unknown.

The native Central Valley steelhead are also spring spawners as opposed to the present winter spawning stock, which tend to be in poor condition (often spent – already spawned) during the winter fishery. The spent hatchery fish in photo at right caught in early March near Nimbus Hatchery was in poor condition.Central Valley SteelheadWith record low numbers of winter (Dec-Feb) steelhead reaching the hatchery this year2 , maybe it is time to rethink steelhead management on the lower American River.

 

Some suggestions follow:

  • “The current broodstock for this program should be replaced with an alternative broodstock that is more appropriate for the American River.” California Hatchery Review Project – Appendix VIII Page 20 Nimbus Fish Hatchery Steelhead Program / June 2012 (http://cahatcheryreview.com). Being the only out-of-basin origin stock in the Central Valley, the present American River Hatchery stock is a threat to all native Central Valley steelhead populations (genetics). Given the very low population abundance of the American (Nimbus Hatchery) stock, this would be a good time to change (replace) the present genetic stock. This could be accomplished by designating the Nimbus Steelhead Hatchery as a “conservation hatchery” to be populated by “natural origin” fish from various sources including other Central Valley rivers, selected American River steelhead (e.g., spring run), or native American River trout from above Folsom Reservoir. This change could be implemented immediately.
  • Hatchery releases in the immediate future could be of spring-early summer fingerlings, to allow natural adaptation and imprinting on the river. Yearling releases to the river should cease because yearling hatchery fish compete with and prey upon wild steelhead and salmon fry. If yearling releases are made, the smolts should be trucked to Discovery Park and then barged to the upper Bay.
  • Wild, natural steelhead spawning and rearing habitat should be restored on the upper ten miles of river below Nimbus Dam. This would include restoration of side channel spawning and rearing habitat. It may also include a weir with a ladder in the middle of the 20-miles of the lower river to keep out competitors and predators including striped bass, smallmouth bass, tule perch, American shad, pikeminnow, and suckers3. It must also include careful management of the cold water stored in Folsom Reservoir and flows in the lower American River .
  • Catch-and-release fishing should continue on wild fish with limited harvest on hatchery fish.4
  • To ensure protection of the new “wild” or “natural” stock, a trap and haul program5 to establish a natural spawning and rearing population above Folsom Reservoir should be considered as recommended in the Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan6 and OCAP Biological Opinion regarding operation of the Central Valley Project’s American River Division7.

More on the American River and Central Valley steelhead in forthcoming posts.

Are Delta Smelt Going Extinct?

Posted on by

Recently Dr. Peter Moyle (UC Davis) suggested we “prepare for the extinction of delta smelt”1. Record low summer and fall abundance indices in 2014 following declines over the past decade in the key survey indices have led to major concerns about the future of this endangered species. The first three survey of this winter’s trawl survey brought record lows for January and March (Figure 1). Dr. Moyle and many others are particularly concerned with the March catch of only six adult smelt.

Winter Kodiak Trawl Survey, Delta Smelt Adults

Figure 1. Catch statistics from Winter Kodiak Trawl Survey Jan-Mar 2002-2015. (CDFW data)

Will the record low numbers of Delta Smelt adults be sufficient to bring some recovery when the rains come again as in 2010 and 2011, the last two years with abundant rain and snow before the present drought? As Dr. Moyle pointed out, it is too early to tell. March larval smelt surveys in 2010 and 2011 captured few larvae, as have larval surveys so far this March. This year is different in that the present drought continues whereas the previous drought ended in 2010 and 2011.

Will another year of drought spell disaster for the smelt? That very well may be the case if the State Water Resources Control Board accepts the recent Temporary Urgency Change Petition submitted by the US Bureau of Reclamation and the California Department of Water Resources to change Delta water quality standards. The petition requests relaxation of Delta inflow, outflow and salinity standards, all of which are designed to protect water quality and Delta fish and their habitats, in order to sustain water deliveries to water contractors during the present drought. The changes will undoubtedly lead to higher losses of smelt and further degradation of their freshwater and low-salinity habitat, which could lead to even sharper declines than those apparent during the present and previous droughts. Stay tuned, as we will be keeping close track of events and the Delta Smelt, as well as preparations for their possible extinction.